Chronicle of a Death Foretold and the Stranger Essay

combat Resulting From the Negative Effects of Rigid Societal Expectations in A storey of A decease Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The Stranger by Albert Camus Everyone has felt the force per unit area of societal expectations during their life clock time. The forbid effects order brings on ones life can lead to a feeling of rejection towards the people who do non conform to consider those standards.Gabriel Garcia Marquez, author of Chronicle of a Death Foretold, and Albert Camus, author of The Stranger, both construct the external moral interlocking of fiat versus the protagonist in order to critique the way nine fails to pick out the moral values of the people who differ from the norm. In Chronicle of a Death Foretold, Gabriel Garcia Marquez punctuates the central conflict of golf club versus the protagonist, based on beliefs and values, through and through the controersy leading up to the murder of capital of Chile Nasar, which is based on family approve and p re-marital perk up.When Pedro and Pablo Vicario ask their sister, Angela Vicario, who had stolen her virginity, her response is described as She alone took the time necessary to say the name and she nailed it to the wall with her well-aimed dart, like a womanise with no will whose meter has already been written. capital of Chile Nasar, she said(47). Describing Angelas response as only took the time necessary indicates that she is trying to drop the blame on Santiago, making him a scapegoat, in order to nurse the true man who took her virginity before marriage.In the Latin American clubhouse, where the linguistic context of the novella takes place, it is not selectable for a woman to affirm pre-marital sex due to the beliefs and morals of Catholics. Santiago is represented as the butterfly whose sentence had already been written. Even though there is no rise Santiago took Angelas virginity, it is the twins duty to hold dear their sister. Therefore, Pedro and Pablo Vicari o circuit out to kill the man who had stolen their sisters virginity, Santiago Nasar, in order to protect their family.The twins tell eitherone in town virtually their plan to murder Santiago, but the people in the community uncertainness their intentions twenty-two people declared they had heard everything said, and they all coincided in the spirit that the only reason the brothers had said it was so that someone would come over to hear them(51). The people in the town who coincide in the impression that the only reason the brothers had said it was so that someone would come over to hear them shows how oblivious the townspeople prompt owards a societal members life. night club vistas past at the fact that a murder is approximately to occur, but focuses on the purpose family honor, which is highly respected. Since it is unacceptable for a female to ache sex before marriage, Santiago is viewed in a negative light by orderliness because he is accused of taking the virginit y of an mateless woman. The debate surrounding Santiagos death highlights the conflict among conjunction and the protagonist, where Santiago is a man who is accused of committing an act that society does not accept.Albert Camus, in The Stranger, constructs the protagonist, Monsieur Meursault, as a man who has absurdist morals and values, which society does not accept. Meursault has an intimate relationship with Marie Cardona, a former typist, but the connecter does not go beyond a physical attraction she cherished to know if I loved her. I answered the similar way I had the last time, that it didnt mean anything but that I probably didnt love her (41).By Meursault stating it didnt mean anything and I probably didnt love her highlights his absurdist views on life he believes life contains no purpose, so he cannot love Marie because loving Marie would give life a purpose, which Meursault does not believe. He simply associates with Marie, because he likes beingness around her. There is no need for an emotional connection because the physical appearance of her is satisfying enough. Absurdism is not accepted in society and then it does not accept Meursault.He is an outsider in a world he did not choose. Meursault is a man who does not show his emotions very well, but instead focuses on his physical need I explained to him, however, that my nature was such that my physical inevitably lots got in the way of my feelings (65). Meursault saying that my physical needs often got in the way of my feelings emphasizes the simplistic life he livea life without meaning. Showing emotions would signify a life with purpose, which Meursault does not believe.The Algerian society, in which the novella takes place, does not accept the type of lifestyle Meursault lives and believes every life should be lived with a purpose. Societys expectations clash with Meursaults values because his beliefs and outlooks on life are not accepted by society, which sets up the external conf lict between the two. In the external conflict between society and the protagonist, Garcia Marquez emphasizes the negative effects society has on a person who goes against the social norm by showing the biased opinions towards the Pedro and Pablo Vicario regarding Santiagos murder.After brutally stabbing Santiago to death, the Vicario twins dah to the church to inform the priest of their barbaric act Both were timid from the barbarous work of death, and their clothes and arms were soaked and their faces smeared with sweat and save living blood but the priest recalled the surrender as an act of heavy(p) dignity(49). The priest calling the murder an act of great dignity shows how, in the Latin American society, family honor is highly valued, no matter how far it is taken. Even though the twins provoke perpetrate the worst evil imaginable, it is acceptable because it was done in order to protect their family.Pedro and Pablo Vicario are viewed as meeting expectations, as opposed to Santiago, who fails to follow them. When the crime was brought to court, the twins had already won before it even started The lawyer stood by the thesis of the homicide in legitimate defense of honor, which was upheld by the court in good faith, and the twins declared at the end of the trial that they would have done it again a thousand times over for the same reason (48). The lawyer stating the homicide as a legitimate defense of honor verifies that society values family honor over a mans life.The court case represents the conflict of society against Santiago and since he goes against societys values, Santiago ends up dying, indicating societys victory. The twins do not receive any severe punish handst, because of their intentions to protect their family. Through Santiagos death, Garcia Marquez stresses the harmful effects society can have on someone whose beliefs differ from societal standards. Camus constructs Meursaults trial to critique societys lack of acceptance towards th e people who do not meet expectations.Throughout the court case, Meursault is quickly judged by the prosecutor due to his actions concerning his catchs death, He said the truth was that I didnt have a soul and that nothing human, not one of my moral principles that governs mens wagon, was within my reach (101). The prosecutor bluntly stating that Meursault didnt have a soul and is incapable of having moral principles that governs mens hearts highlights how society does not understand Meursaults morals and values, thus critiques his source and neglects him. Meursault is looked down upon because of how he acted on the day of Mamans funeral.He does not express feelings towards his mothers death because he is an absurdist and believes death is inevitable. Society believes that there is purpose to every societal members life, and since Meursault shares absurdist views, he is not accepted by society. To close his final argument against Meursault, the prosecutor states, I ask you for t his mans headnever as strongly as today have I felt this bitter duty made easier, light, clearer by the certain knowledge of a sanctified imperative and by the horror I feel when I look into a mans face and all I essay is a monster. (102). The whole trial is based around Meursaults character, and him being called a monster stresses the fact that society is unwilling to accept anyone who does not follow the expectations. Meursault does not share the same views that society wants, and as a result, he is rejected because of his moral values. By asking for this mans head the prosecutor shows how society neglects the people who share different views and therefore want them out of society completely.Camus uses the trial and Meursaults crime to emphasize the external conflict of society versus the protagonist, Meursault, to demonstrate how society does not accept people who share different moral values. The negative effects society has on the people who do not meet expectations are em phasised through the external conflict, based of moral values, between the protagonist and society in the Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The Stranger by Albert Camus. Both novellas show the harmful consequence faced by the protagonist, who do not conform to societal expectations, which evidently resulted in death.